Execution Log: the-loop diagnoses its own failures and files the bug itself
Append-only log of progress for the user's visibility.
Phase transitions
| Phase | Entered | Reviewed/approved by | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| phase-selection | 2026-08-16 | @MadaraUchiha-314 | Declared by the owner filing #242 and starting this cloud session on it. The ticket is unusually complete — it states the trigger case (#240), the opt-in default, the redaction MUST, the never-arm rule and the label — so brainstorming is skipped (the idea is not fuzzy); design-critic-review not selected (no critic configured in this repository). See Deviations from the standard gates. |
| requirements-definition | 2026-08-16 | pending — PR for this branch | requirements.md: six requirements; the two security-critical ones (redaction, never-armed) written in formal register. |
| design | 2026-08-16 | pending — PR for this branch | Reuse-first: critics.run_critic for the isolated agent, comments.py's contract for the gh writer, excerpt.py's allow-list argument for redaction. Six alternatives recorded as rejected. Risk tier 4 (schema touched). |
| test-planning | 2026-08-16 | pending — PR for this branch | 13 rows, 6 in scope; every n/a carries a reason; one manual activity (a human reads the dry-run output for redaction quality). |
| tasks-breakdown | 2026-08-16 | 12 tasks, two independent red roots. | |
| implementation | 2026-08-16 | TDD: the red run captured and committed before the code. | |
| verification | 2026-08-16 | Every applicable activity ran, including a REAL agent dry run (T11 upgraded past its plan — see the progress entry). | |
| needs-review | 2026-08-16 | ||
| complete |
Pull requests
| PR | Scope / tasks | Status |
|---|---|---|
| #257 | The whole work item — the spec chain and the feature. | open |
Progress entries
2026-08-16 — mapped the seams before designing
- Phase: requirements-definition → tasks-breakdown
- Did: read the #240 trace as the archetype (
dispatch.failed×3 →poll.comment_failed,will_retry: false, and a human reconstructing the story fromevents.jsonlby hand), then mapped the code: the event log is the one central sink;critics.run_criticalready is "one agent, one process, one envelope, no shell"; nothing anywhere creates a GitHub issue today; nothing appliesrouting.autoExecuteLabelprogrammatically; and there is no redaction utility in code — only theexcerpt.pyallow-list precedent and prose obligations. - Found, and it decided the design: #240-style defects do not surface as uncaught exceptions — the poll loop and the dispatch worker both swallow-and-continue by design. Detection therefore had to be a policy over event-log records (error-level + terminal give-ups), not an except-hook. That single fact shaped D2.
- Also decided:
parse_commandmatches control keywords anywhere in a body (whole-tokenre.search), so agent prose mentioningthe-loop startmust be mechanically defanged, not just avoided (R6.2).
2026-08-16 — red first, then one choke point
- Phase: implementation
- Did: wrote the 49 guarding tests first and captured their failure as
evidence/red.md; thenredact.py,core/selfdiagnosis.py, thediagnosecommand, the two daemon wiring points, theselfDiagnosisschema section (both copies), the dogfood config block, the event types, the state-layout entry and the docs pages. - Two findings from the self-review rounds, both fixed:
eventlog.emit(event, ...)collides with a field namedevent— thediagnosis.*records carry the triggering event type astriggerinstead.- The
diagnoseverb emitted into an unconfigured event log, so a posted issue would have left nodiagnosis.postedtrail — it now callsconfigure_from_file("diagnose")like every other emitting command. A third suspicion — the scan lock failing on a missing state root — was checked and dismissed:RunLock.acquirecreates parent directories itself.
- Checkpoint/tests: 2274 passed, 1 skipped;
make lint,make format-check,make typecheckclean. Evidence inevidence/.
2026-08-16 — the verification ran a real agent, deliberately
- Phase: verification
- Did: T11 was planned as "dry-run, human-read". The environment had a real
claudebinary, so the run was upgraded to the strongest available form: a seeded event log carrying the #240 trace plus planted sensitive values (a fakeGH_TOKEN, a private-repo work item ref, absolute paths), fed through the real default agent path — synthetic critic,claude -pone-shot in a temp dir — with--dry-runso nothing posted. The printed report was then read for redaction quality: no planted value survived. Output inevidence/dry-run.md.
Deviations from the standard gates
phase-selectionwas answered by direct instruction, not by the checklist comment. This work started from the owner's cloud-session request on the ticket rather than fromthe-loop start, so no checklist was posted and nothe-loop executereply exists. The owner's filed ticket is the authorization; the spec chain exists in full rather than being skipped.- The artifacts are
in-review, notapproved. Nothing here has been through a human gate yet; the pull request carries the whole chain for review in one place. No phase claims an approval it does not have. - Risk tier 4 without a pre-implementation spec approval.
autonomy.tiers["4"]ishuman-approves-pr, so the gate this work needs is the PR itself — butsecurity.review.humanSignOffMinTier: 4also applies: the PR briefing explicitly requests a named human security sign-off on the redaction and never-arm contracts. - No
loop:<phase>label on #242 from the harness — the known #73 gap: a cloud session has no daemon. The phase state is this file.
Capability docs
- New:
docs/capabilities/self-diagnosis.md— the capability's current-behaviour contract, indexed incapabilities.md. Minted product-feature shaped: the behaviour is one coherent surface (detect → diagnose → redact → file), not a slice of an existing doc. - Decision:
decision-090, indexed indecisions.md.
Documentation
docs/config/cli/self-diagnosis-options.md— theselfDiagnosisblock, every key with Type and Default (P3–P5 gated).docs/cli/commands/diagnose.md— the verb (P1/P2 gated), plus both vitepress nav lists and thedocs/config/cli/index.mdpage table.docs/cli/state.md— the self-diagnosis ledger: classification row, its own section, and the.gitignorerecipe line (mirrored into this repo's.gitignore, as the S4 parity test requires).- README: unchanged, with reason — its CLI section is a deliberate highlights list, not a command reference; an opt-in diagnostic verb belongs in the full reference the section already links to.
- Skill/reference docs: unchanged, with reason —
reference/observability.mdpoints at theEVENT_TYPEScatalog rather than duplicating it, and the newdiagnosis.*types are registered there; no prose in the skill describes a surface this change altered.