Execution Log: resume-on-respawn collides with the tmux session it replaces
Append-only log of progress for the user's visibility. Checked in alongside the spec at
docs/specs/issue-146/.
Phase transitions
| Phase | Entered | Reviewed/approved by | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| requirements-definition | 2026-08-04 | Issue #146: tmux new-session hits duplicate session on the respawn fallback and the identical failure recurs. Traced to six defects across runner.py and dispatcher.py. | |
| design | 2026-08-04 | Tri-state session_state probe (tmux answered vs. never answered), a protective+verified _clear_target, and a _respawn_tmux that routes into a live occupant instead of replacing it. | |
| tasks-breakdown | 2026-08-04 | 15-task DAG, extended to 19 after the owner's follow-up. | |
| implementation | 2026-08-04 | Implemented on claude/github-issue-146-icpgbh | |
| needs-review | |||
| complete |
Progress entries
2026-08-04 — spec drafted
- Phase: requirements → design → tasks
- Did: Read the whole tmux delivery/respawn path end to end (
Dispatcher._dispatch_one→TmuxRunner.deliver→_respawn_tmux→_try_resume→TmuxRunner.spawn) plus the poll-path retry accounting (Poller._process_comment,PollState). Confirmed six cooperating defects rather than the single missinghas-sessioncheck the issue reports — crucially,spawnalready probes and clears, so the collision arises from the probe's fail-open reading of an unansweredtmux has-session(10 s timeout) against anew-sessionthat waitsdispatchTimeoutSeconds(1800 s) and therefore gets the real answer. Table of causes inbugfix.md§ Root cause. - Decided: an occupant of
loop-<slug>is always this work item's own agent, so a live one is never killed — the pending event is delivered into it. That single rule removes both the crash-loop and the silent-kill bug that today's "working" branch has. - Next: implement T1–T15 (TDD per task).
2026-08-04 — owner follow-up folded in (AC11, AC12)
- Phase: requirements → design → tasks (re-opened, then re-locked)
- Input: issue comment — (1) an upgraded CLI + restarted poller should pick up already-stuck items; (2) is "registry active but tmux killed → resume the same conversation in a new tmux session" handled?
- Found: (1) was a real gap the collision fix alone would not close.
_process_commentgives up afterpolling.maxRetriesand then callsresolve_comment(...), which baselines the comment identically to a successful delivery — so the ledger cannot distinguish "done" from "abandoned", and no later cycle would ever revisit it. (2) is the issue-89 path; it exists, and issue-146 was what made it unreliable. - Decided: record a give-up as one (
gaveUp: {comments, version}) and re-arm it version-gated, once per item per run — not on every start, becausepoll --oncefrom cron would otherwise re-forward abandoned comments every minute; and by construction anyone who has this fix has upgraded, so the upgrade is the correct trigger. No proactive tmux sweep: the re-armed comment is a real event, so the existing delivery/respawn path heals the session with no synthesized boot prompt. Answered on the ticket. - Next: T12b–T12d alongside the original DAG.
2026-08-04 — implemented, self-reviewed, docs updated
- Phase: implementation → needs-review
- Did: T1–T14.
runner.py:TmuxResult.exit_code, the fourSESSION_*states,session_state, a protective+verified_clear_targetand the single-retryduplicate sessionhandler.dispatcher.py: the opening occupancy check in_respawn_tmux,_deliver_into_occupant,_skip_occupied, thesession_existsbranch of both spawn call sites, and a_try_resumethat no longer blames the conversation for a collision.poller.py:gaveUp: {comments, version}and a version-gated, once-per-item-per-run re-arm. New event typessession.respawn_averted/poll.rearmedand thesession-occupieddrop reason. - Deviations from the plan, and why:
- T3 —
has_sessionwas not re-expressed oversession_state: that would have added a pane read toterminate_harnessandsessions attach, which only need existence. It stays one call with its unknown→False reading. - T10 — instead of renaming
STUB_TMUX_PANE_DEAD_ONCE, the stub tmux was made stateful. The old stub answeredhas-sessionwith "yes, and it is live" for every name, which (a) is why a bug this shape could ship, and (b) made the new pre-flight refuse every first spawn in the suite. With session lifetime modelled, absence is the default,new-sessionon a held name reportsduplicate session, and the pane knob became unnecessary in three tests. - Self-review finding, fixed:
_clear_target(present=True)originally fell through tokill-sessionwhen the probe would not say what held the name — i.e. it could still destroy a live agent it could not see, contradicting the decision the whole change rests on. It now reports such an occupant as live so the caller tries delivering into it; only a definite dead-pane reading licenses a kill.
- T3 —
- Evidence:
1132 passed, 2 skipped; ruff (check + format), pyright (0 errors), markdownlint (0 errors),validate_config.pyall clean — the same commands the pre-commit hooks and CI run. - Known limit (recorded, not hidden): AC11 is forward-looking. A comment abandoned before this ships carries no
gaveUprecord and is indistinguishable from a delivered one, so it is not re-armed; what un-sticks an already-stranded item is the collision fix itself landing the next event. Stated on the ticket and inbugfix.md§ Out of scope. - Next: T15 — PR + reviewer briefing, then human approval (tier 3).
2026-08-04 — CI: the-loop's own PDLC gate rejected the spec's headings
- Phase: needs-review (no code change)
- Failed: the
gatejob —the-loop check issue-146 --recompute --fail-on block→BLOCK requirements-definition · required section is missing: Requirements.checks(ruff/pyright/pytest/markdownlint) was green. - Cause: the spec was written with paraphrases of the required headings ("Acceptance criteria (EARS)" for
## Requirements, numbered "6. Testing strategy" for## Testing strategy, "Tasks" for## Task list).validate-artifactsmatches heading text exactly, by design — which is the point of the gate, and dogfooding it means using the bundled templates' vocabulary rather than my own. - Fixed: restructured all three artifacts to the template headings (
bugfix.md:## Requirementswith seven### Requirement Nblocks, each carrying its EARS criteria and keeping the(ACn)tags everything references;design.md:## Architecture/## Components & interfaces/## Error handling/## Testing strategy/## Trade-offs & decisions/## Security design;tasks.md:## Task list), ticked T15/T16, and named the upstream security markers (trust boundary,abuse case) in both artifacts soenforces-boundaries-fromruns instead of skipping on a near-miss word ("trust boundaries" is not a substring of "trust boundary"). - Also verified the gates CI cannot reach yet (the walk stops at the human
requirements-approval, correctly): ran thedesignandtasks-breakdownhooks' checks directly — required sections present and non-empty, artifacts locked, mermaid blocks passcheck_mermaid, no unchecked task boxes. - Evidence:
the-loop check issue-146 --recompute --fail-on block→ exit 0 (WAIT requirements-approval · no authorized feedback yet— the normal state of an open PR). Code gate re-run: 1132 passed, ruff/pyright/markdownlint clean. - Learning candidate: a spec artifact should be started from
skills/the-loop/templates/*.mdrather than written freehand and reconciled later. Third occurrence would justify a write-up perselfImprovement.