Skip to content

Final validation: Repo tooling setup ​

Summarised from verification.md; raw output in output.md.

Final validation evidence ​

Acceptance criterionHow it was provedWhere
R1.1–R1.5 — tiny_harness project, Python 3.14, uv + .venv/, uv.lock enforced, from tiny_harness import …Fresh clone: uv sync --locked → .venv/ on 3.14.7; uv build → tiny_harness-0.0.0 sdist + wheel; CI's uv sync --lockedverification rows 1, 5, 6
R2.1–R2.4 — hello_world, unit test, Gherkin-documented integration testuv run pytest -v → 16 passed, including the wheel-install scenariorow 4
R3.1–R3.3 — ruff, pyright strict, pytest configured and cleanuv run pre-commit run --all-files → 5/5 passedrow 3
R4.1–R4.3 — commitizen rejects bad messages, accepts conventional onesgit commit -am "bad message" exit 1; "docs: good message" exit 0row 8
R5.1–R5.4 — hooks installed by one command; lint, type and test failures blockuv run pre-commit install; three blocked commitsrows 2, 9
R6.1–R6.4 — PR CI runs hooks, integration tests, docs buildPR #5 checks: 3/3 successrow 11
R7.1–R7.6 — release on merge via Trusted PublishingWorkflow-invariant tests (jobs chained, scopes, env pypi, bump-skip guard); cz bump computes 0.0.0 → 0.1.0 and bumps pyproject.toml + uv.lock together. The live run happens only after mergerows 4, 10, 12
R8.1–R8.5 — VitePress site, Pages deploy, tech-stack and local-dev docs, README linksbun run docs:build passes; screenshots of rendered pages; docs.yml tested. Pages deploy runs only after mergerow 7, home, guide, spec page
Security abuse cases 1–4Workflow-invariant tests; /security-review with no findingssecurity-review.md